Return-Path: Delivered-To: info@tictactocsaintcanut.com Received: from cl-t211-187cl.majeunesse.ca by cl-t211-187cl.majeunesse.ca with LMTP id /xGHNWSdsmbBGwAAV5eKQw (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 06 Aug 2024 18:02:12 -0400 Return-path: Envelope-to: info@tictactocsaintcanut.com Delivery-date: Tue, 06 Aug 2024 18:02:12 -0400 Received: from mail3.culturacusco.gob.pe ([181.176.220.90]:54092 helo=mail.culturacusco.gob.pe) by cl-t211-187cl.majeunesse.ca with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sbSFx-0001ji-1Y for info@tictactocsaintcanut.com; Tue, 06 Aug 2024 18:02:12 -0400 Received: from mail.culturacusco.gob.pe (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.culturacusco.gob.pe (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 712F1B0304A42; Tue, 6 Aug 2024 16:48:25 -0500 (-05) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.culturacusco.gob.pe (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A18EB0232985; Tue, 6 Aug 2024 16:47:16 -0500 (-05) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 mail.culturacusco.gob.pe 9A18EB0232985 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=culturacusco.gob.pe; s=C8533470-F1F2-11EA-9109-16785B91DAB8; t=1722980837; bh=oGBj7bqPHsJ9MKSGl2NHGdnaro9sRpEoksYWbRI8kjY=; h=MIME-Version:To:From:Date:Message-Id; b=T/8eWAHp7G6XoE1ILlA8/vafhxHdca7Rzo96d9rJDC/v+WfifOjhfIEZ4mPdLymQn 3NjF9/iyAHSFG6m9LYxYKOlEeTPXvgakNbQe7JNoQ6gb6Evj39Avzqh3oJWninL0Dg 9SpDNYvrKJ0TWx83GjGlIkRO373159VYaPojVjzPK6/ju72ovyIb2vdzt1HKErh2i9 T0xOnHQN4yNSCXz8qAANd1j0dVUGayaCvTlc10FhiDfQMrYHz1cYLfcik2Hm0sd1DR BPLVE+2/qs8uSlWYKezQHJx6HowJhxZILAek6BiukRX7MLJ2o/W5NoZ6hkD9c74paW 14ZF1Ur7v7MKg== Received: from mail.culturacusco.gob.pe ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.culturacusco.gob.pe [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id WH2uQAbRFoan; Tue, 6 Aug 2024 16:47:16 -0500 (-05) Received: from PMOSES80B1.localdomain (unknown [84.239.17.166]) by mail.culturacusco.gob.pe (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4333EB0031530; Tue, 6 Aug 2024 16:46:29 -0500 (-05) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: Mail message body Subject: Remember To: Recipients From: "Yuliia Kadulina" Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2024 22:45:26 +0100 Reply-To: yuliakadulia@gmail.com Message-Id: <20240806214630.4333EB0031530@mail.culturacusco.gob.pe> X-CULTURACUSCO-MailScanner: Not scanned: please contact your Internet E-Mail Service Provider for details, Not scanned: please contact your Internet E-Mail Service Provider for details X-CULTURACUSCO-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-CULTURACUSCO-MailScanner-ID: 9A18EB0232985.A2FC0 X-CULTURACUSCO-MailScanner-From: iaguirrec@culturacusco.gob.pe X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.3 X-Spam-Score: 43 X-Spam-Bar: ++++ X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-t211-187cl.majeunesse.ca", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see root\@localhost for details. Content preview: I understand we don't know each other yet but there is a serious proposal i want to discuss with you. Content analysis details: (4.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: culturacusco.gob.pe] 0.0 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. [181.176.220.90 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com] 0.0 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. [181.176.220.90 listed in sa-trusted.bondedsender.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain 2.0 PYZOR_CHECK Listed in Pyzor (https://pyzor.readthedocs.io/en/latest/) 2.5 FREEMAIL_FORGED_REPLYTO Freemail in Reply-To, but not From X-Spam-Flag: NO I understand we don't know each other yet but there is a serious proposal i want to discuss with you.