Return-Path: <mmaradiaga@mail.mp.hn>
Delivered-To: info@tictactocsaintcanut.com
Received: from cl-t211-187cl.majeunesse.ca
	by cl-t211-187cl.majeunesse.ca with LMTP
	id OXK0D+JgB2fNIgAAV5eKQw
	(envelope-from <mmaradiaga@mail.mp.hn>)
	for <info@tictactocsaintcanut.com>; Thu, 10 Oct 2024 01:06:42 -0400
Return-path: <mmaradiaga@mail.mp.hn>
Envelope-to: info@tictactocsaintcanut.com
Delivery-date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 01:06:42 -0400
Received: from mail.mp.hn ([190.92.22.6]:49970)
	by cl-t211-187cl.majeunesse.ca with esmtps  (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.96.2)
	(envelope-from <mmaradiaga@mail.mp.hn>)
	id 1sylNr-0002In-2Q
	for info@tictactocsaintcanut.com;
	Thu, 10 Oct 2024 01:06:42 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.mp.hn (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59C213ACB67E;
	Wed,  9 Oct 2024 22:55:22 -0600 (CST)
Received: from mail.mp.hn ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (mail.mp.hn [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032)
	with ESMTP id GSp6iNRdw7ea; Wed,  9 Oct 2024 22:55:22 -0600 (CST)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.mp.hn (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DD1D3ACB7C5;
	Wed,  9 Oct 2024 22:55:22 -0600 (CST)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 mail.mp.hn 0DD1D3ACB7C5
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mail.mp.hn;
	s=BF4225C8-0936-11ED-80C2-AF0015B3317E; t=1728536122;
	bh=oGBj7bqPHsJ9MKSGl2NHGdnaro9sRpEoksYWbRI8kjY=;
	h=MIME-Version:To:From:Date:Message-Id;
	b=HO/mdWCihJ6S7Wjnc1EH3Ci0fZmjbG55Z3ZJdiH0hMbR6xUCFkdl+4/dPiGtsM9r1
	 66IqerFBMZG/nqnYfxRemQZTl7rRk53pevzdBaIuE1iegrpPGcLuwB3GCnMQPBftRU
	 9UHYq/YUrDtljyWqkpSf2LXtZV13pgN33bS0ebSAnFiDzqiRUzYwtcOzqTesWURNnO
	 b4TLqxweTa8/6vxpkCtkVpbsBAXLYPtP19Tdu8zV3/N0g9EgUmcwKFz8j1Sg2LSwmI
	 afXeIEa676Evfl8M7L9mJYXqnI2XipM34UfXO0jl1TJG66g4dfhGVcqzny9HmZDNuK
	 Mc+7IxW21EuPw==
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mp.hn
Received: from mail.mp.hn ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (mail.mp.hn [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026)
	with ESMTP id p-mBlAkbKlNR; Wed,  9 Oct 2024 22:55:21 -0600 (CST)
Received: from MAC4754.localdomain (unknown [77.81.142.86])
	by mail.mp.hn (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3BD773ACB759;
	Wed,  9 Oct 2024 22:55:05 -0600 (CST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Description: Mail message body
Subject: New Message
To: Recipients <mmaradiaga@mail.mp.hn>
From: "Yuliia Kadulina" <mmaradiaga@mail.mp.hn>
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2024 21:54:49 -0700
Reply-To: yuliakadulia@gmail.com
Message-Id: <20241010045506.3BD773ACB759@mail.mp.hn>
X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.7
X-Spam-Score: 47
X-Spam-Bar: ++++
X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-t211-187cl.majeunesse.ca",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 root\@localhost for details.
 Content preview:  I understand we don't know each other yet but there is a serious
    proposal i want to discuss with you. 
 Content analysis details:   (4.7 points, 5.0 required)
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
  0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED          ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was
                             blocked.  See
                             http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
                              for more information.
                             [URIs: mp.hn]
  0.0 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The
                             query to Validity was blocked.  See
                             https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243
                              for more information.
                             [190.92.22.6 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com]
  0.0 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The
                             query to Validity was blocked.  See
                             https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243
                              for more information.
                            [190.92.22.6 listed in sa-trusted.bondedsender.org]
  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
                             valid
  2.0 PYZOR_CHECK            Listed in Pyzor
                             (https://pyzor.readthedocs.io/en/latest/)
  0.0 KAM_DMARC_STATUS       Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict
                             Alignment
  0.1 DKIM_INVALID           DKIM or DK signature exists, but is not valid
  2.5 FREEMAIL_FORGED_REPLYTO Freemail in Reply-To, but not From
X-Spam-Flag: NO

I understand we don't know each other yet but there
is a serious proposal i want to discuss with you.
